ICDM·Research Active

INSTITUTE OF CRITICAL
INFRASTRUCTURE
DECISION MAKING.

Independent research on emergent risk, governance frameworks and institutional behaviour in regulated markets.

About ICDM

The Institute of Critical Infrastructure Decision Making is the independent research arm of Direct Intelligence. ICDM exists to examine the institutional, cognitive and structural forces shaping how critical national infrastructure is governed, regulated and decided upon.

Research is published through The Signal - six active series covering emergent risk domains where governance frameworks are either absent, contested, or failing to keep pace with technical reality.

ICDM does not publish advisory opinion or commercial guidance. Its output is independent research - designed to inform governance, regulatory and institutional decision-making across CNI sectors and their suppliers.

Institutional RecordOpen
Founded2025
ClassificationOpen · Research Active
Research Series6 Active
Published Articles18
Sectors Covered24 CNI
DirectorGary Daniel Doran
AffiliationDirect Intelligence Ltd

Output

Six Active Research Series

Read The Signal →
S-01Active
Governance Failure in Regulated Markets

Examining cases where formal governance frameworks have failed to prevent institutional failure. Pattern analysis across CNI sectors.

S-02Active
AI Decision Systems in Public Institutions

Research into the deployment of automated decision systems across health, welfare and criminal justice. Risk, accountability and trust.

S-03Active
Sovereign Supply Chain Intelligence

Trade corridor analysis, foreign dependency mapping and critical supply chain resilience across UK CNI sectors.

S-04Active
Institutional Trust Architecture

How CNI organisations build, signal and lose institutional trust. Decision science applied to governance and procurement contexts.

S-05Active
Emergent Risk in Critical Infrastructure

Forward-looking risk identification across physical, cyber and systemic threat vectors. Research ahead of the regulatory cycle.

S-06Active
Standards Contestation and Regulatory Drift

Where competing standards frameworks produce regulatory ambiguity. ISO, NIST, DSIT and sector-specific standards in conflict.

Research Mandate

Research is published where governance is absent.

Not where it has already been settled.

The Signal

READ THE RESEARCH.

Access The Signal →